On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 06:01:17PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 12/04/2012 08:25 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >It tells a human user that the operation failed. It could also notify > >a script that the operation failed, e.g. if we decided to return a > >nonzero exit status. (ovs-vsctl is intended for use by both humans > >and programs.) > > > >I'm perfectly willing to add another column, or use another existing > >column, to provide more detail about why a particular port or > >interface cannot be added. > > I'm not against that at all. I will be glad to come up with a patch that > does just that and allow to exit ovs-vsctl with a proper exit code in > case add-port fails.
It sounds like all parties are happy with that as a starting point, so why don't we start there. > OTOH, I doubt that it will be possible to implement > this for all error scenarios that may occur while a bridge reconfigures. I agree. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
