On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:28:46AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 05:19:36PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > this series is based on v2 of your Open Flow 1.1 work. > > Please let me know if you feel that I should rebase on top of v3. > > It's probably not necessary, because my v3 is so preliminary, and the > patches that are close to being ready are very similar to those in v2. > > > Also, I apologise for not having reviewed v3 of your patches yet, > > I will try to get to it before the weekend. > > OK. But I think you've already looked at the patches that are close to > being ready. Some feedback on approach for the new patch at the end is > especially welcome though. > > > In terms of features, I believe that this series brings the > > Open Flow 1.2 implementation to the same level as the Open Flow 1.0 > > implementation. However, it is not complete as Open Flow 1.2 includes > > features not present in Open Flow 1.1. > > That's good news, though! Thanks for the new series! > > > I have performed limited testing of this series using: > > > > * ovs-controller as the controller for ovs-vswitchd > > > > * ryu as the controller for ovs-vswitchd > > - www.osrg.net/ryu/ > > > > * Using the dump-* targets of ovs-ofctl > > Hey, so it really works now? That's great!
Of course there are bugs as my test coverage is not complete. But yes, an Open Flow 1.2 can be negotiated and a number of messages appear to work. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
