On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 03:33:26PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > Questions > > --------- > > > > bridge_reconfigure_ofp() has the following comment: > > /* Do any work needed to complete configuration. Don't consider ourselves > > * done unless no work was needed in this iteration. This guarantees that > > * ofproto_run() has a chance to respond to newly added ports. */ > > I don't understand the implications. What is the effect if > > ofproto_run() does not get a chance to look at newly added ports? > > Does the existing code do this? > > I thought it helped with an issue I was running into, but it turned > out not to and I forgot to remove it.
It looks like your incremental removes the behavior but not the comment. > > Cleanups (and possible performance improvements) > > ------------------------------------------------ > > For some reason I thought that iterating through ofproto ports only > hit the ofproto code and didn't go all the way to the datapath which > is why I did it so liberally. It wasn't a big deal to optimize it. Thanks! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev