Thanks Simon. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:04:30AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:34:53PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > I don't think that the ofp12_match structure will really be useful in > > this form. If we just defined an "ofp_match_header" that just > > contains length and type, we could probably use that somewhere. > > That sounds reasonable. Would it be ofp11_match_header or would > it also cover Open Flow 1.0?
It would be ofp11_match_header because OpenFlow 1.0 didn't have a uniform header for matches. To be sure, the header is only two 16-bit bits (type and length). It may or may not pay off to have these in a struct; we'll see. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
