On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 04:25:33PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > Hmm. ?The "bond - single port" test is a bit paradoxical seeing as a > > single port isn't a bond. ?I guess it illustrates that LACP works with > > a single port too. > > Yes, I wanted to verify that a bond doesn't get created in this case. > Would you prefer I rename it, or change the test in some way?
Do you intend to add non-LACP related bond tests? If not, then I think that keeping these as "lacp" tests, rather than renaming them, is less surprising. After all, of the two tests, both are related to LACP, but only one is related to a bond. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
