On 11/30/2011 5:21 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011 à 08:14 -0500, jamal a écrit : >> On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 15:00 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: >> >> >>> The other factor I considered is scalability. The OVS code as is >>> is not really friendly to SMP/NUMA scalability (but as Eric pointed, >>> neither is the classifier/action layer). >> >> Did you mean the qdisc funnel-to-interface part which Eric is hopefully >> going to work on now that bql is in? classifier/action happens way >> before that. > > Actually I am waiting for John work on this area, before wasting my > time ;) >
I'll try to get these out in the next couple days. Got a few qdiscs running without the qdisc lock today. After I get some real numbers and make them at least a bit more presentable I'll post them so folks can let me know if they think its the right approach. Thanks, John. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
