On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:01:55AM -0500, jamal wrote: > > Ah yes, them locks. Unless you start doing per-cpu tables > with lazy synchronization i am not sure how to avoid that. > Note: last time (time flies) i compared against iptables, the tc flow > setup/teardown was pretty consistent regardless of table size > relatively speaking.
iptables sets a pretty low bar :) For a flow cache I think going per-cpu or at least per-node will be unavoidable. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
