On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:46:26PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote: > > and maybe we should even change the > > member name in struct ofp_match to nw_dscp (or whatever you like). > > > As you know, the interplay of TOS and DSCP in OpenFlow are a passion > of mine. I've kept that field name "nw_tos", since it's using the bit > positions of TOS but only the DSCP portion is matchable. Assuming > OpenFlow 1.2 moves the DSCP match over by two bits, then true DSCP > matches (ie, a range of 0-63) will have a name with "dscp" in them. > (I just realized that I broke this convention in > cls_rule_set_nw_dscp(), so I'll send out a follow-up patch for that. > Oh joy!)
OK. I'm always amazed how others see inconsistency where I just see hobgoblins, though. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
