On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:21:07AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> @@ -71,22 +71,23 @@ struct flow {
> >> uint8_t dl_dst[6]; /* Ethernet destination address. */
> >> uint8_t nw_proto; /* IP protocol or low 8 bits of ARP
> >> opcode. */
> >> uint8_t tos; /* IP ToS. */
> >> + uint8_t nw_ttl; /* IP TTL/Hop Limit. */
> >> uint8_t frag; /* FLOW_FRAG_*. */
> >
> > Is there any policy on the prefixes for these fields? Some seem to
> > have nw_ but others don't.
>
> Apparently not--I noticed the same thing. Ben, would you be opposed
> to my adding a "nw_" prefix to "tos" and "frag"?
That's fine with me.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
