On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:34:25PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: >> The interfaces related to tunneling aren't finalized enough to be >> sent upstream but we also still want to retain them in the OVS >> repository. Since userspace should be compatible with both versions >> of the kernel, this renumbers the tunnel interfaces to high numbers >> so that we can continue to add new interfaces without conflict. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> > > We have arrays sized on some of these values. I have a series out > that uses policy parsing for key attributes in userspace, so this is > going to require changes in that series, and I was planning to do the > same thing in the kernel. However I don't see a better way to do it > yet, so...
This definitely results in some unfortunate waste of space though I don't see really see an alternative. The thing that I was most concerned about was kernel stack space, which at the moment, at least, this doesn't affect. What would you change in response to this? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
