On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:44:00AM +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: > Bernd Eilers schrieb: > > Mathias Bauer wrote: > > > [ ... snip ...] > > You named it. But as I already answered to Christian: I agree that > "immediately" may be an exaggeration. But we have to discuss if and how > we can detect infrastructure problems and how we will have to deal with > them. Starting now and fixing problems later is not acceptable. That's > the same as what we (try to) do with our product. ;-)
Not looking at red tinderbox status means: (risk of) breaking the build and fixing later. > > It´s the same as with performance tests and convwatch tests where we > > currently have just one computer per platform and you also have to wait > > in the queue. > > Should we discuss how often these tests break? And what a relief it is > that you can ask someone via phone to restart them? You see, there are > some open questions to discuss. Building OOo is not that flakey as running some automatic tests. > [...] ciao Christian -- NP: Korn - Divine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
