Hi Rony, Am 17.08.21 um 17:51 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher (Apache): > On 17.08.2021 17:37, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: >> Hi Matthias, >> >> On 17.08.2021 16:10, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 17.08.21 um 15:55 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher (Apache): >>>> On 16.08.2021 10:20, Bidouille wrote: >>>>> Hello team, >>>>> >>>>> Since july, AdoptOpenJDK has been renamed Adoptium JDK. >>>>> This project don't provide any JRE for Windows x86. >>>>> https://adoptium.net/releases.html >>>>> >>>>> So this will be a problem if AOO port x64 is not completed: >>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594 >>>> You may want to try >>>> <https://www.azul.com/downloads/?os=windows&architecture=x86-32-bit&package=jdk-fx> >>>> which also >>>> includes JavaFX (which AdoptOpenJDK seems to ignore). (There are quite a >>>> few Java OpenJDK sites >>>> which all use the same sources, depending on the site 32-bit Java versions >>>> may be available or not.) >>> See: >>> >>> https://adoptopenjdk.net/faq.html#openjfxfaq >> Yes, I know that statement, however it is not true, there are backports of >> OpenJFX bug fixes exactly >> for that reason (also, OpenJFX has been using OpenJDK 11 as its baseline). >> That is also the reason >> why others do support the "FX" and/or "FULL" versions. Not sure why they >> state that, maybe no one >> re-checked or there are no resources for JFX available (which is actually >> not necessary as one just >> has to add the four FX modules to a distribution and voilà they are >> contained). >> >> ---rony > As an example, here one of the latest OpenJFX backport to OpenJDK 11:
I am not that deep into Java, I only use AdoptOpenJDK to compile AOO. ;-) What JRE the user installs is up to him/her... Regards, Matthias > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: [jfx11u] RFR: Request to backport July 2021 CPU changes > Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:20:20 +0200 > From: Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> > To: Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > CC: openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net <openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net> > > > Approved. > > - Johan > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 6:01 PM Kevin Rushforth > <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Johan, > > > > I request approval to backport the changes from the just-released July > > 2021 CPU to jfx11u (for 11.0.12) . > > > > > https://github.com/kevinrushforth/jfx11u/compare/db9b1b7440...cpu-2107-sync > > > > This is a straight backport (patch applies cleanly) of the one FX fix > > that went into the July CPU. > > > > NOTE: Since this is an integration of already-reviewed fixes, I will > > push it directly to the master branch of the jfx11u repo rather than via > > a pull request. > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- Kevin > > > > or > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > Subject: Request to backport 7 fixes to 11-dev for 11.0.11 > Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:53:11 +0100 > From: Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> > To: openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net List <openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net> > > > > Hi Kevin, > > I request permission to backport the following issues to 11-dev, for the > 11.0.11 release: > > JDK-8258592: Control labels in Dialogs are truncated at certain DPI > scaling > levels > > JDK-8256283: IndexOutOfBoundsException when sorting a TreeTableView > > JDK-8165749: java.lang.RuntimeException: dndGesture.dragboard is null in > drag > > JDK-8249737: java.lang.RuntimeException: Too many touch points reported > > JDK-8252099: JavaFX does not render Myanmar script correctly > > JDK-8261460: Incorrect CSS applied to ContextMenu on DialogPane > > JDK-8248126: JavaFX ignores HiDPI scaling settings on some linux platforms > > - Johan > > ---rony > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
