Hi Matthias, On 17.08.2021 16:10, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 17.08.21 um 15:55 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher (Apache): >> On 16.08.2021 10:20, Bidouille wrote: >>> Hello team, >>> >>> Since july, AdoptOpenJDK has been renamed Adoptium JDK. >>> This project don't provide any JRE for Windows x86. >>> https://adoptium.net/releases.html >>> >>> So this will be a problem if AOO port x64 is not completed: >>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594 >> You may want to try >> <https://www.azul.com/downloads/?os=windows&architecture=x86-32-bit&package=jdk-fx> >> which also >> includes JavaFX (which AdoptOpenJDK seems to ignore). (There are quite a few >> Java OpenJDK sites >> which all use the same sources, depending on the site 32-bit Java versions >> may be available or not.) > See: > > https://adoptopenjdk.net/faq.html#openjfxfaq
Yes, I know that statement, however it is not true, there are backports of OpenJFX bug fixes exactly for that reason (also, OpenJFX has been using OpenJDK 11 as its baseline). That is also the reason why others do support the "FX" and/or "FULL" versions. Not sure why they state that, maybe no one re-checked or there are no resources for JFX available (which is actually not necessary as one just has to add the four FX modules to a distribution and voilà they are contained). ---rony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
