> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2020 5:13 PM
> To: dev
> Cc: dev...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Committer: Detlef Nannen
> 
> 
> 
> > On Jul 1, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Jörg Schmidt 
> <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote:
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann 
> [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2020 4:18 PM
> >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: New Committer: Detlef Nannen
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Am 01.07.20 um 16:08 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann:
> >> 
> >>> Is this your opinion or the opinion of Detlef?
> >> 
> >> This was a mistake: The right question is:
> >> 
> >> Is this your opinion or the opinion of Jan-Christian?
> > 
> > STOP!
> > I'm only speaking specifically in person here. Try not to 
> doubt that!
> > 
> > (In fact, I haven't had the chance to talk to Jan at all, 
> because I've only known about the development for a few hours)
> > 
> >> Or are there more people involved in producing the flyers?
> > 
> > Isn't it enough to treat one unjustly?
> 
> Why is our announcing new Committers a problem of justice?

Because others who have done the SAME job are denied being committers because 
they are not even asked.

> It 
> should be celebrated. You should stop these accusations. 

I'm sorry, but I will not stand by silently and watch our project become a 
gentlemen's club, where everyone is sworn to an opinion and whoever dares to 
express his own opinion is treated as an Troublemaker.

Why do I say that? Because it is not enough for me to do only simple work here 
and to have to keep silent about important things. Of course I am here to make 
AOO better, but I am also here to help shape FOSS policy.

Is that presumptuous? Well, I've been volunteering for OpenOffice (first OOo 
now AOO) for 15 years, if that doesn't count what then?

Unfortunately, I had to learn what counts, e.g. accepting employees of IBM into 
the PMC and pretending that it is personal achievement (in the sense of 
voluntary work) to do what you are paid for professionally.
Well, maybe that was helpful, but is it fair to give one person something with 
a light hand that you withhold from the other just because you don't like her 
opinion in some things?

> If 
> there are people that you feel the PMC has missed then please 
> send an email to private@openoffice and let the PMC know. 

No, thank you. I'm not gonna pretend that everything is okay here when in truth 
it's not.

I have had little confidence in the PMC(*) since I experienced the reaction of 
the PMC to a critical request (on private@openoffice) from me.

(*)
Let me be more specific: I have little trust in those who are currently have a 
decisive influence on its activities, because there are also members of the PMC 
whose performance I regard with great respect and many members whom I have 
never got to know concretely.

> Many of us are NOT on the dev-de@openoffice mailing list and 
> don’t spend any time there. If there have been personal 
> attacks on the -de lists then please let the PMC know at 
> private@openoffice so that it can be looked into. Personal 
> attacks are not OK.

I had a dispute with a PMC member on the mailing list. Do you really think it 
is helpful to complain to the PMC about being verbally attacked by a PMC member?


greetings,
Jörg




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to