Hi Yuri, all > There ought to be some checking of how unified is the handling of the 1.2 > plain or extended between the LO and AOO.
If I understand correctly only ODF 1.2 is a standard (OASIS and ISO), so creating a document with the same content on any software should result in identical files (only differing in the name of the software where it was produced) I believe ODF 1.2 Extended means each editor can extend as appropriate which can lead to inconsistencies (a bit like Microsoft's XML files only work perfectly if you are using exactly the same version as it was saved) > I remember seeing some differences already. I have found the same even in very simple documents. Again, if Extended means what I described, that is expected... So the only logic thing for AOO to do is to jump from 1.2 to 1.3 and forget about Extended? Or are there any Extended bits in AOO's format that need to be preserved (and are not included in 1.3)? Regards, Pedro --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
