Hi Jörg, Jörg Schmidt schrieb am 09-Feb-20 um 12:28:
Hello,
[..]
I myself have been following the development of ODF from the very beginning and I have to underline what you write, or rather I have to take a critical look at the approach of the TDF, because: In terms of a free, uniform format for office documents and the declared intention to formulate this standard as an ISO standard, it is regularly counterproductive for LO to deviate from this and implement OASIS standard.
No, it is the only way to go. ISO itself does not develop standards by itself. The standards are developed somewhere else and then they are submitted to ISO. Only after ODF 1.3 is an approved OASIS standard, we can go the next step to ISO.
However, we should keep in mind that the behaviour of the TDF is not optimal as far as the interests of the sum of all users are concerned.
Without the help of TDF we would not have got the COSM project and ODF 1.3 would be far away from becoming a standard.
https://publicsoftware.eu/members/cosm-project/ Kind regards Regina --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
