Hi Jim, On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 2:02 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > Yes, please. I've been playing around and some issues are related to how, in > moving to Mojave/Catalina, Apple removed some *.o files from /usr/lib, as > well as some issues related to Xcode11 in general. I was hoping to have a > single setup that allows for both 4.1.x and 4.2.x+later but that doesn't seem > viable. > > Yeah, I think it's time to consider making macOS 10.9 the min allowed for > 4.2.x+later.
I build on Catalina basically with MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET="10.9" MACOSX_SDK_PATH="/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.15.sdk" Some of the external dependencies need some tweaking because in Catalina there are no system headers on /usr/include (the workaround for Mojave does not work for Catalina, there is no package with the headers to install). And OpenSSL is a problem, I don't recall the rationale to build with system openssl on macOS, but now it makes sense to build the internal version. > Quite interested in the QTkit fix. The fix is quite trivial and should work with 10.7 (I can only test on Catalina ATM), the AV Foundation port was already done by hdu, it's on trunk, I'll remove the QTKit bits and cherry-pick in aoo418. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
