Hi Marcus, Am 17.01.19 um 20:42 schrieb Marcus: > Am 17.01.19 um 13:41 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Two of my commits were immediately picked by LO. [1] [2] >> >> Always nice to see, that down streaming still works for the fork... :-D > > sure, better then to draw this on their own. > > Again with a note who has tested and reviewed it - which is totally > fine - but no hint where it comes from and who is the author. They > still don't want to tell where they get the code from.
Not exactly, Pilot_Pirx is me... ;-) But now it looks like I would have committed it directly to LO, while they just monitor aoo/trunk and take what they can use. [1] Regards, Matthias [1] https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/1170f10906a9bca78782df6ab1b6a4e20cf0435a > > Is this redicioulous or just sad? I don't know. :-( > > Marcus > > > >> [1] >> https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/28dee1129c7a9c4da34b9253aefd6c6b2df1a073 >> >> [2] >> https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/9796738e1149a99f8b3ff687b0f72264ba3a56ff >> >> >> Am 14.01.19 um 16:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> At this stage, I think just back porting (svn merge) to the AOO42X >>> branch is fine. >>> As we get close to a release, we'll need to either have an RM >>> approve it >>> or so something like creating a STATUS file, with a list of proposed >>> backports >>> and requiring at least 3 +1s to backport (ie: RTC) >>> >>>> On Jan 14, 2019, at 10:40 AM, Matthias Seidel >>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jim, >>>> >>>> Am 09.01.19 um 21:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>> On Jan 9, 2019, at 3:46 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Ahh... something w/ the cppuhelper stuff. Obviously, some UDK >>>>>> issue I'm thinking... >>>> How is the process to get commits merged from trunk to AOO42X? >>>> >>>> I adjusted some pointers for Windows and Linux: >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1851110 >>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1851111 >>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1851214 >>>> >>>> Additionally I updated some pointers for OS/2. I know that Bitwise is >>>> already working on a port of 4.2.0, so they would be useful. >>>> >>>> Since it took me several attempts it would be easier, if I would >>>> commit >>>> them directly. .. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>>> Yeppers... for sure it's the udk versioning, which is more a Linux >>>>> thing than a macOS (or Windows) thing. >>>>> >>>>> Will look into either hacking around it or something else. I >>>>> thought I had fixed it. Obviously not :( > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
