Hi George You can skip the building of gtest by passing --disable-unit-tests to ./configure.
Damjan On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:03 PM George Karalis <thorb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have been testing for a while now, the MSVC 2010 compiler and the > Windows 7.1 SDK, with OpenOffice. > While I configured the project correctly finding the correct compiler and > SDK, I build the project and while, > most of the modules build successfully with several warnings on the new > compiler, others refuse to build > so I am having trouble continuing to a full correct build. More specific > the project’s external gtest library, > produces errors, while building. In a thread > <https://github.com/google/googletest/issues/276> in gtest i have found > that a certain version of gtest fails with > the MSVC 2010 compiler. > > I enclose a config log of the configuration with the MSVC 2010 compiler. > All in all, the migration seems > to work fine except on several modules. I thought that I was fairly close, > but it seems that more build > tests are needed in order to generate a correct build. > > Best regards, > George > > > On 14 Oct 2018, at 13:09, Gavin McDonald <ipv6g...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Please consider filing an INFRA ticket with any new software versions that > might be needed on the Buildbots. > Also eqnuire about an extra 16.04 buildbot if needed. > > Gav... > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 9:31 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Hello George, > > Am 10.10.2018 um 13:23 schrieb George Karalis: > > Hello, > > This is an update of the current MSVC task. So far I had success in > > integrating MSVC 2015 > > to the project but it requires Windows SDK 8.1 or higher in order to > > work correctly. I ‘ve > > found that Microsoft has reworked the folder structure of this SDK so it > > requires additional > > work to be done in the configure.ac, in order to find the correct > > compilers and tools. Same > > thing at the Windows 10 SDK, which has a more different structure. > > > Thank you for your work! > Windows is the main platform for our users with about 85% of downloads. > Still is has been a bit neglected... > A newer SDK/compiler will certainly help us on our way to a 64-bit version. > > > Another thing that requires additional work is the integration of MSVC > > 2017. I was able to > > find the installation from the registry, using oowintool, copy the > > required dll etc., but in Visual > > Studio 2017 the folder structure is completely different, so changes are > > also needed at > > configure.ac, for —with-cl-home to work correctly. > > So that leaves me with the following notes: > > (1) Integrate MSVC 2010 with Windows 7.1 SDK, both are available from > > Microsoft, no > > additional work is needed at the configure level, and update the > > project to MSBuild > > (Easy) > > > This is the SDK we are talking about? > https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=8279 > > As a non developer I would say this should be our first step. > > > (2) Integrate MSVC 2017 with Windows 10 SDK, requires more work, but it > > ’s the main > > goal. > > I ‘m thinking of doing an incremental integration. Work on option (1) > > and after a successful build > > continue to option (2). Option (1) also provides support for Windows XP, > > so we could stick at > > that for a while. After (1) is complete I presume that building to a new > > compiler and SDK, will > > be easier, since the project will have already changed to MSBuild. > > > Sounds like a plan to me. > And I also think it would be good if we can support XP for some > additional time. > > Regards, > Matthias > > > What are your thoughts and suggestions about this matter? > > Kind regards, > George > > > > > > -- > Gav... > > >