Am 22.10.18 um 18:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > All done. hash-sign-512 removed as a consequence.
Thanks! > >> On Oct 22, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 22.10.18 um 02:10 schrieb Peter kovacs: >>> Stupid question where is the script? >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/release-scripts/ >> >> - hash-sign.sh generates ASC, MD5 and SHA256 >> >> - hash-sign-512.sh generates ASC, MD5 and SHA512 >> >> We must not provide MD5 anymore and Marcus would prefer to offer ASC, >> SHA256 and SHA512 on our download page. >> >> So we would need a modified script now. >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >>> Am 21. Oktober 2018 23:58:25 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel >>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>: >>>> Am 21.10.18 um 23:55 schrieb Marcus: >>>>> Am 21.10.2018 um 23:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>> Am 21.10.18 um 22:43 schrieb Peter kovacs: >>>>>>> When the year issue has been fixed, I think we can call it an RC1. >>>> I >>>>>>> check tomorrow evening. Sorry had no energy for stuff on the >>>> weekend. >>>>>> How do we want to sign the builds? >>>>>> >>>>>> "For new releases, PMCs MUST supply SHA-256 and/or SHA-512; and >>>> SHOULD >>>>>> NOT supply MD5 or SHA-1" [1] >>>>>> >>>>>> My suggestion would be to only supply SHA512. >>>>> I don't see a problem to support also SHA256. And it's less work to >>>>> re-write the download scripting. >>>> OK, then someone has to work on the signing script... ;-) >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>>> Marcus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Signatures and checksums could be generated with: >>>>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/release-scripts/hash-sign-512.sh >>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums >>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 21. Oktober 2018 20:19:53 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel >>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>: >>>>>>>> Am 21.10.18 um 20:08 schrieb Marcus: >>>>>>>>> Am 21.10.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>>>> Am 21.10.18 um 19:59 schrieb Marcus: >>>>>>>>>>> Am 20.10.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>>>>>>>> That's what it looks like, yeah. >>>>>>>>>>> copyright years are always forgotten to update. Every year the >>>>>>>> same. >>>>>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>>>> In fact I *did* update it for trunk in January... ;-) >>>>>>>>> hm, OK. Are you sure that you have updated it everywhere it is >>>>>>>> needed? >>>>>>>>> Even here the script could be helpful. >>>>>>>> I did update it where we always(TM) updated it: >>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1780015 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But there are several parts (ODK, Linux packaging) which should >>>> get >>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>> attention. >>>>>>>> In 4.1.x they were not updated in all these years... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So +1 for a script from me! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Marcus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But my test build are always with --with-vendor in configure, so >>>> I >>>>>>>>>> didn't realize that it was missing from branch 4.1.6. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We now have a script to update version numbers; somewhere in >>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> devtools I think. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What about to create a new script to list all the code lines >>>> with a >>>>>>>>>>> the year number. Then someone can have a look and compare it >>>> with >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> current calendar year and if needed create a patch to update >>>> all >>>>>>>>>>> affected year numbers at ones. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe a good first step because no year number is forgotten. >>>> The >>>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>>> one would be to automate this update. But I've not yet an idea >>>> how >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> do this. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Marcus >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Matthias Seidel >>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 20.10.18 um 17:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Found it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Great! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixed in r1844422 and r1844423 >>>>>>>>>>>>> That means, when using --vendor it is updated automatically, >>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise not? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Jim Jagielski >>>> <j...@jagunet.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we sure that that part of the splash screen isn't >>>> hardcoded >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ie: the Copyright part)? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that I use '--with-vendor="Apache OpenOffice >>>> Community >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Build" \' for macOS and I am guessing the buildbots also >>>> use >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configure option, so maybe that's a clue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2018, at 9:45 AM, Pedro Lino >>>>>>>> <pedro.l...@mailbox.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is probably because your OS is named Darwin (more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolved?) :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Build1844227_Linux_x86_64.png> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On October 20, 2018 at 2:35 PM Jim Jagielski >>>>>>>> <j...@jagunet.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... The macOS builds are showing 2018: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Screen Shot 2018-10-20 at 9.34.44 AM.png> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2018, at 7:14 AM, Pedro Lino < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pedro.l...@mailbox.org <mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But even if I wanted, I can not change the >>>> copyright >>>>>>>> year... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what I am wondering about. ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. I (wrongly) assumed it was all editable :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW: Can you confirm 2017 as copyright year in >>>> Jim's >>>>>>>> Linux >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> builds? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, Jim's build is showing 2017. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pedro >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature