I am sorry for the confusion I am causing. Sometimes I get stuck in topics, and overrated them due to an inner loop of focus. In this case it were to not give attackspace to possible trolls. That's why I called it Libre Office troll feedback loop. Libre does only show up because they use Libre for stumping on us. There is no one involved except me and my other 1000 versions of myself. ;) I hate when this happens because I tend to do stupid things. And I need time to clear such loops up.
In the end it is important that someone does the chair job and Carl or myself will need to make time for it. We can spend the time well for other things. I don't have to do this but will if selected. I think same goes for Carl. That's all I think is important to know. I am really sorry. Am 14. Dezember 2017 20:38:36 MEZ schrieb Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>: >Am 14.12.2017 um 09:21 schrieb Peter kovacs: >> It is not about what we agree upon. >> This is a public vote. And whoever gives a vote is deciding now. >> >> Maybe this is an effect from trolling against us, but I do not think >there is space for public weakness or naivete. (And I try not do do >both...) >> I thought about putting my preferences into my description and >decided against it because it would weaken the project. >> I was really thankful on Andrea's words. Which are nicely written, >but I thought again it would be a weakness to show the thankfullnes so >I stoped to write the comment and my vote. >> >> Sorry if I over complicate things. >> I really do not mind whoever gets the job. We have all much to do and >only little time. >> >> So I am now again late for work :( >> I really hate the "Libre Office troll feedback loop"! > >now I'm confused. Why is Libre Office influencing this vote? I don't >see >any connections. > >Marcus > > > >> Am 14. Dezember 2017 03:11:32 MEZ schrieb Carl Marcum ><cmar...@apache.org>: >>> On 12/13/2017 07:08 PM, Peter kovacs wrote: >>>> I am confused. There was no proper " I do not want to candidate >>> anymore mail." >>>> But maybe my English is not good enough. >>>> >>>> A one candidate vote is something completely different as between >2+ >>> candidates. Such a step should be well thought of if this is really >the >>> right step. >>>> >>>> Also I would like to know how do you count votes for Carl if he has >>> resigned, which I doubt. >>>> >>>> Not so happy >>>> peter >>>> >>>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> I can still be in and prefer you become Chair this time. >>> >>> If I misunderstood your desire to be Chair I apologize. >>> >>> I stepped up to make sure we had a new chair even though my workload >is >>> >>> very high right now. >>> >>> I thought you had changed your mind about waiting until next year. >>> >>> If you do not want it, My offer still stands and I'll stand in. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
