2017. 01. 11. 10:26 keltezéssel, Raphael Bircher írta: > Hi Akos > > Am .01.2017, 08:29 Uhr, schrieb Nagy Ákos <a...@romkat.ro>: > >> Hi, >> >> it is impossible, because the LO license is LGPL+MPL, that can't be >> merged in OpenOffice. > As whole package yes, but you can ask individual contributors to put > there code to Apache License 2.0. We talk about more then 1500 individual contributors. > >> The single way is that OpenOffice can merge in LibreOffice, more exactly >> the OpenOffice.org is redirected to LibreOffice.org, because the OO code >> is outdated compared with LO code. > How you know, the AOO Code is outdated? We maintain the code, as LO > maintain there code. Please come with facts. Sorry, maybe not the outdated expression is a good expression but someting similar. AOO has 13598 commits from 2011 (including webpage changes) and LO has aprox 100000 commits in same time. I know that only the commit number not equal with the code quality, but represent progress in code quality too. https://www.openhub.net/p/openoffice/commits/summary https://www.openhub.net/p/libreoffice/commits/summary > >> The LibreOffice brand now is more popular than OpenOffice, and some >> other facts: LibreOffice have few hundred new features that OO don't >> have, LibreOffice have a cloud suit (LibreOffice Online) etc. >> You can compare the development trends: > > Libre Office is maybe popular at the Linux world, and even there exist > Users who kick LO and install OpenOffice. There are big features in LO > who simply shipped over to LO. Native SVG Import. Mac OS X 64 Bit > port, and the Sidebar for exemple. Many of the added Features are > simply buddled Extensions. > > More feature dosen't mean a better product. If you add a load of new > bugs to the software in the same time, the user will not be happy. You are right, if the new features means only new bugs. But some features is necessary for daily work. And many features is very useful and for many people is required: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.4 ... https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/5.3 > >> https://www.openhub.net/p/openoffice (include webpage and wiki) >> https://www.openhub.net/p/libreoffice (only application code) >> >> Based on financial reports, TDF has income equal to Apache Foundation, >> and TDF spend all money to LibreOffice, but Apache only a little part >> from their income spend for OO. > Apache spend more or less only the infrastructure. TDF and ASF are not > comparebel. ASF does not found individual projects at all. Not even > the ApacheCon is founded over ASF budget. > > Regards, Raphael > > >> >> 2017. 01. 10. 20:43 keltezéssel, suhail ansari írta: >>> Hi, >>> >>> My name is Suhail and I have some suggestions for OpenOffice >>> community. >>> >>> OpenOffice is very popular and it attracts large number of >>> downloads. My suggestion is that Apache software foundation should >>> talk to the document foundation and ask them to merge their >>> foundation with Apache software foundation because Apache is world's >>> biggest open source software foundation and if the document >>> foundation joins Apache then we can have one product (OpenOffice). >>> The ASF has many popular open source software products like hadoop, >>> tomcat, OpenOffice etc. It will be good for both ASF and the >>> document foundation to work together. >>> >>> >>> Suhail Ansari >>> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
