Marcus wrote:
Am 09/29/2016 03:26 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
RAT is a tool that we might even not want to use. The important thing is
sometimes I really don't know why someone is coming to such a statement.
This is one of this moments. Why shouldn't we use the RAT scan? Do you
want to search for broken license headers yourself? ;-)
No, of course! I meant: the important thing for the release is that
licenses are OK. RAT is a tool that we use for convenience, but it is
not mandatory that it passes; if RAT gives warnings that are false
positives then we are free to ignore these warnings; and the release
will still be OK, it is not invalidated by the fact that a tool gives
false positives. So it is not mandatory to fix this for 4.1.3, but it
deserves attention for 4.1.4.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
