Hi. On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > >> > Hi Don, > >> > > >> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > >> >> > junit 4.11 is installed on the new buildbots we are prepping for > use > >> fwiw > >> >> > >> >> We'll also need hamcrest version 1.3. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Ubuntu 14.04 LTS python-hamcrest is version 1.8 , is that too new? > >> > I'd like to try and stick to what the Ubuntu apt-get packages provide, > >> > if not possible, alternate uris where we can get other versions from. > >> > >> We don't want python-hamcrest. We just want the hamcrest1.3.jar file. > >> I think this is it: > >> <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/hamcrest/hamcrest- > >> all/1.3/hamcrest-all-1.3.jar> > >> > >> > > ok, in that case should we just not add it as a buildbot buildstep to > > download it during a build ? > > That was something that Damjan suggested as a possibility, but the > question was whether ext_sources was an appropriate place to stash it as > it is a compiled artifact. > > Based on this old bug report: > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/junit/+bug/784631>, you might > want to investigate whether the junit package actually include hamcrest > as well. > > I expanded the install /usr/share/java/junit4.jar and saw no evidence of hamcrest - and the bug you reference is still open, so not fixed I guess :/ I found where it is being actively developed (junit4 and junit5) on GitHub. https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/blob/master/pom.xml Shows that it pulls in hamcrest as a dependency - does that mean it makes it available for use ? I don't know. I'm not really here in a coding capacity but to help get the builds up and working on new buildbot slaves so we can decomission the old ones. I'll help test the builds until they work, but I hope that dependencies can be resolved internally in the project - i.e. I hope someone can work with the github code above or an alternative and get me something I can just install and move on to the next piece. (same with dmake) Thanks Gav...