On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: >> > Hi Don, >> > >> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> >> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: >> >> > junit 4.11 is installed on the new buildbots we are prepping for use >> fwiw >> >> >> >> We'll also need hamcrest version 1.3. >> >> >> > >> > Ubuntu 14.04 LTS python-hamcrest is version 1.8 , is that too new? >> > I'd like to try and stick to what the Ubuntu apt-get packages provide, >> > if not possible, alternate uris where we can get other versions from. >> >> We don't want python-hamcrest. We just want the hamcrest1.3.jar file. >> I think this is it: >> <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/hamcrest/hamcrest- >> all/1.3/hamcrest-all-1.3.jar> >> >> > ok, in that case should we just not add it as a buildbot buildstep to > download it during a build ?
That was something that Damjan suggested as a possibility, but the question was whether ext_sources was an appropriate place to stash it as it is a compiled artifact. Based on this old bug report: <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/junit/+bug/784631>, you might want to investigate whether the junit package actually include hamcrest as well. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
