Oh, I'm sorry, Dave. I thought I was making it clear, on this change of subject, that I am not talking about trademarks but only 3rd parties deriving from ALv2 code itself, including by "rebasing," forking, or any other means.
With regard to the use of marks and "Powered By" I agree that is separate and find your comments about that on the other thread interesting. I agree that is about permitting use of ASF trademarks. I responded to that separately. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 12:41 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Third-Party ALv2 Dependencies (RE: Limiting Trademark Policy Discussion ...) I appreciate all your diligence about licenses. It is valuable. Whatever you want to call this thread ... One intention was to discuss what if anything is required with respect to trademarks when ANY third party product is (re)based on Apache OpenOffice. For example it cannot be called OpenOffice. If there are exceptions to this then these should be openly and explicitly acknowledged. I am not saying that there are any. You are missing the idea of creating a Powered By designation which is about trademark and not the license. If no one is interested then fine. If everyone is happy with the status quo so be it, but I don't think it is the case. Regards, Dave [ ... ] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
