> On 14 Jan 2015, at 12:27, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > > The TL;DR: I don't think there is a reasonable way to depend on Qt in AOO. > > I also don't think that depending on Qt, were it feasible, would satisfy the > concern that started this thread concerning the difficulty of maintaining > [with] VCL. It might just move the pea to a more-difficult third-party > dependency, after requiring a mammoth cut-over to a new GUI framework.
Agreed. The sole benefit, besides pleasing some, would be to bring in new developers and plausibly more companies. But I doubt the cost of switching would be paid by the influx of contributors and I would expect that if we do want to engage in a new, and probably ruthless refactoring, that we should look elsewhere. louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
