On 23/12/14 23:00, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Here is a typical example of confusion about this product, > > <https://www.marshut.net/pyzxp/aoo-for-android-not-worth-the-download.html>. > Notice "Apache's Open Office for Android." And folks speak of AOO for > Android as if it is the AOO known to us. That review was written two years ago, when Android OpenOffice was littered with Apache branding. Even looking at the small print, it was hard to discover that it wasn't an official Apache Foundation port. I'll grant that the presence of advertising should have tipped off that it wasn't an official Apache Foundation port, but back then, it was so unobtrusive that it would not have been noticed. jonathon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
