Let's imagine a roller coaster.

But I would also ask then the group at OX (Ye Olde Hamburg contingent), as
well as others in LO, say, to join in. This quarter century chunk is
*serious* time. It's not a trivial expanse of forget me nots trod under
history's sneakers.

It's time that's been spent making a product that's proven resilient and
powerful and it its making included a huge number of people, not all of
whom are here listening but all the same are there using.

louis

On 24 November 2014 at 13:01, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Roberto Galoppini <
> roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2014-11-23 21:55 GMT+01:00 Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > >
> > > > On 2014-11 -23, at 12:58, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Rob Weir <r...@robweir.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the
> > > >> continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a
> > > >> proprietary suite developed in Germany called StarOffice, which
> itself
> > > >> started as StarWriter, an application written in 1985 by Marco
> Börries
> > > >> .
> > > >>
> > > >> So next year, in 2015, will be our 30th anniversary.
> > > >>
> > > >> Any ideas what we might do?
> > > >>
> > > >> For example, does anyone still have a Zilog Z80 (or an emulator)
> that
> > > >> can run the original StarWriter?
> > > >>
> > > >> It looks like some emulators here:
> > > >>
> > > >> http://www.z80.info/z80emu.htm#EMU_CPU_W32
> > > >>
> > > >> It might be interesting to show the history of Writer, from release
> to
> > > >> release, via a set of screen shots (or a movie) showing the
> evolution
> > > >> of the UI.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> -Rob
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Can we reach a consensus on whether 2015 should be a 25 yr or 30 yr
> > > > anniversary? It would be great to get some graphic types involved
> soon
> > in
> > > > creating an appropriate logo for the websites to put up in 2015.
> > >
> > > Why do we need a certain date to enable good graphics? Note, I’m a
> > > historian. That means that I distrust any claim to date certainty and
> > > believe, rather, that we can trace backwards the emergence of
> modalities
> > of
> > > living which in the present lay claim to having been birthed at
> > particular
> > > moments, though in historical narrative that was only when they were
> > > revealed to be as such.
> > >
> > > Hence, a graph(ic) would do nicely, no? Not a cake but a chart?
> >
>
> I wasn't actually thinking of a cake but maybe a fun modification to the
> round logo for a year -- encircled with silver (25th anniversary?) or the
> like.
>
>
>
> > >
> >
> > Would be cool to do something like this: http://historyofbitcoin.org/
> >
>
> Yes, it would, and I think we have this timeline somewhere...I'll try to
> locate it.
>
>
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Despite the fact that 1985 was the release of a text based StarWriter
> > > > rather than graphical, I, personally am good with this date.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > MzK
> > > >
> > > > "One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth
> > > > to a dancing star."
> > > >                                 -- Friedrich Nietzsche
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> MzK
>
> "One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth
>  to a dancing star."
>                                  -- Friedrich Nietzsche
>

Reply via email to