<orcnote> inline below. -----Original Message----- From: Andre Fischer [mailto:awf....@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 04:39 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Build System Improvements
On 17.10.2014 13:21, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Andre, > > will these in the long term lead to a system, where AOO can be build > directly in MS Visual Studio without need of cygwin? Hi Regina, this is not a direct goal but could become possible as a side effect. One of the key ideas of the proposed approach is to further separate between dependencies and build logic and have scripts/programs transform the dependencies into actual make files. Once the dependencies are present as uniform XML files we can more easily write a transformation into Visual Studio solution files. But this will still not be a trivial task. It would help me if you or somebody else could provide a description or even a specification of Visual Studio solution/project files. <orcnote> I don't think you need to go all the way to solution files in order To compile native (win32 and x64) for Windows using Visual Studio, even Visual Studio 2013 Express for the Desktop. One can have makefile- controlled builds and command-line compiles just fine. Developers might want to create "makefile solution" files, but they should not be needed in the source tree. (It might also be valuable to understand MSBuild, which is XML-based already, and that might be a better alternative to constructing solution files. Finally, one reason to make a solution file is to use VS 2013 GIT repository integration, but that only works if pull requests become supported and cloning is to places where pulls can reach.) I think an interesting aspect of Andre's proposal is that one could Take advantage of linking and DLL creation more, not requiring full builds so much so long as there are unchanged static libraries and DLLs. This kind of refactoring might also be important for configurations on limited platforms. The idea is to build and test AOO by component layers. That might make working with GIT more practical as well. (I don't mean releasing separate components, but being able to build up dependencies in stages, even the first time as a way to start working with a fresh clone/checkout of the source tree. Of course, building smaller, specialized distros might be more-easily come by.) </orcnote> -Andre > > Kind regards > Regina > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
