On 26 November 2013 22:06, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 25/11/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> I at least understand the proposal but I don't support it because the >> multi language sets are not use friendly at the moment. >> > > We wouldn't link to it from the main download pages anyway. > > And of course the question is for what we do need the binaries on this >> mirrors if they are not found or used by the majority of our users. >> > > It's a secondary mirror system. Although due to the usual size/bandwidth > considerations the OpenOffice project uses SourceForge, Infra did > significant work to be able to offer OpenOffice on the Apache mirrors. We > can do without it completely, but we can also make their life easier (last > time they needed a full week to propagate OpenOffice to all mirrors) by > storing there one multi-lang installer only. > > Do we have any numbers of downloads from these mirrors? >> > > No. We assume they are negligible, but we literally neglect them in our > download statistics. > > That said, I honestly don't know how much the additional workload would > be: is it only an additional option on the builbots (or build machines) > configuration or will it be needed to adapt other scripts and waste a lot > of time? > I run it on my buildbots, the only difference is --with-lang="a b c ....", the difference in build time is not worth talking about As jsc mentions it would be nice if the installer selected the language used on the OS, that would be a nice little programming exercise for a new developer. rgds jan I. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
