Rob Weir wrote:
In some cases this looks like we have different level of granularity in the two systems. For example BZ has zh, but the actual SDF resource files are zh-CN and zh-TW. Should these be split into two different BZ components?
Thanks for the detailed check. Yes, zh-CN and zh-TW are handled as separate languages and should be separated in BZ too.
It looks like Norwegian is similar, with BZ using "no", while our Bokmal translation is "nb" in the Subversion.
We have "no" = "nb" + "nn". But some dictionaries are for "no" and bundle two languages, some for "nb" and some for "nn", so this is more complex.
And what should we do with codes that exist in BZ but not in the Subversion at all? In theory there could be a website translation where there is no UI translation?
"shs" is such a case. "fur" probably is another one. Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
