On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 8/27/13 10:27 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> On 8/26/13 6:26 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < > >>> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 25.08.2013 23:56, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Right now SNAPSHOT is pointing to rev. 1499347. > >>>>> Does this need to be changed to rev. 1516808? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> just for completeness - rev. 1516808 is the current 'head' revision of > >>>> branch AOO401. > >>>> > >>> > >>> yes... > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> As far as I know, we used the SNAPSHOT tag to tag certain revision for > >>>> snapshot builds from trunk. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> For the recent snapshot build for our way to a AOO 4.0.1 release > Jürgen > >>>> proposed to build a certain revision from branch AOO401. Thus, just > >> another > >>>> approach. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Well maybe I am not understanding the term...I'm looking at Jurgen's > >>> message from 8/22 > >>> > >>> http://markmail.org/message/sttjvg642yzqid5z > >>> > >>> I thought that as of that day, at whatever revision level that was, the > >> tag > >>> should have been moved. It wasn't, so now we are at a different > revision > >>> level in trunk, but....? > >>> > >>> Mostly the reason I ask is that some builds via buildbot are not > working > >>> given the current SNAPSHOT tag -- old. > >>> > >>> > >>>> I think we should continue to use SNAPSHOT tag for snapshot builds > from > >>>> trunk. May be it should be named TRUNKSNAPSHOT next time it is moved. > >>>> For snapshot build from a certain branch, we can continue as in the > >> past - > >>>> just announce the revision used for branch snapshot building - or we > >> could > >>>> introduce a corresponding tag - may be <branch name>SNAPSHOT. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Really, I am mostly asking became of how the buildbots are setup. I > think > >>> we should standardize on a process and definition of SNAPSHOT. > >> > >> I agree and I would like to come to the state where we can simply use > >> the builds of the build bots and that they are compatible with the > >> release builds. I still don't know if that is possible today. At least > >> for Mac we don't have a build bot and we need the 64 bit changes. > >> > >> Linux build bots are to new and are not comparable with the release > >> builds Ariel did. > > > > > > Well probably not, and this is unfortunate. Ariel's builds are always > right > > on for me. Right now none of the builds on buildbot running as SNAPSHOT > > work fro any configuration due to the old "tag" problem I think. > > you get me wrong, I mean the Linux version of the build bots. Ariel > built on CentOS5 systems that have an older baseline. I didn't meant the > version of the office sources. > OK. Really, I can't speak to this since I don't know what the config of the linux buildbots is with respect to OS, etc. This is something we need to investigate. There's no reason in my mind we shouldn't move in the direction of using the buildbots as a stepping stone to actual releases. > > > > > >> Windows is probably close but I don't know for sure if > >> it the same. For example if the 64 bit shell extensions are build > >> correct on the Windows bot. > >> > >> A SNAPSHOT should be a special version where we agree more or less that > >> it is worth to take a closer look on it from a QA perspective. Nightly > >> builds are for developers mainly. > >> > > > > Well, I'm not sure there's a LOT of difference here. You used the work > > snapshot in your previous message, and well, I think that means the same, > > whether the QA folks want to get involved at this level or not. > > > > I don't understand > What I'm getting at is why say you are using something as "snapshot" and then the tag is not changed to reflect that. That's all. When we say something is a "snapshot", what shuold this mean? > > Juergen > > > > >> At the moment the SNAPSHOT tag is outdated and we build old version > >> which makes of course no sense. > >> > >> I will move the tag on the branch for the next build ... > >> > > > > thank you! That makes more sense to me. > > > > > >> > >> By the way where can I read the information about the setup of the build > >> bots and what is build when? > >> > > > > There's not a lot out there for most of us to look at unless we step up > to > > help more with this.... > > > > Here is the link to our "build" config page (commiiters only): > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf > > > > I can't get any specific info on the buildbots themselves -- what > specific > > OS version, what's installed etc. -- really except what's provided by > infra: > > > > http://ci.apache.org/ > > > > but some of this site is outdated because our 32-bit linux builds run on: > > > > http://ci.apache.org/buildslaves/bb-vm2_ubuntu_32bit > > > > which isn't listed in the ci page, along with tethus-ubuntu which is > > running our 64-bit linux nightly build. No Mac buildbot at all. Not sure > > what this would take. There is an outstanding issue (old) for it. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4197 > > > > It would be super if we could get normal and snapshot builds set up on > the > > buildbot for our various configurations. > > > > > > > >> Juergen > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, Oliver. > >>>> > >>>> > >> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org< > >> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "When in doubt, cop an attitude." -- Cat laws
