On 8/27/13 10:27 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On 8/26/13 6:26 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < >>> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> On 25.08.2013 23:56, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> >>>>> Right now SNAPSHOT is pointing to rev. 1499347. >>>>> Does this need to be changed to rev. 1516808? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> just for completeness - rev. 1516808 is the current 'head' revision of >>>> branch AOO401. >>>> >>> >>> yes... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> As far as I know, we used the SNAPSHOT tag to tag certain revision for >>>> snapshot builds from trunk. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> For the recent snapshot build for our way to a AOO 4.0.1 release Jürgen >>>> proposed to build a certain revision from branch AOO401. Thus, just >> another >>>> approach. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Well maybe I am not understanding the term...I'm looking at Jurgen's >>> message from 8/22 >>> >>> http://markmail.org/message/sttjvg642yzqid5z >>> >>> I thought that as of that day, at whatever revision level that was, the >> tag >>> should have been moved. It wasn't, so now we are at a different revision >>> level in trunk, but....? >>> >>> Mostly the reason I ask is that some builds via buildbot are not working >>> given the current SNAPSHOT tag -- old. >>> >>> >>>> I think we should continue to use SNAPSHOT tag for snapshot builds from >>>> trunk. May be it should be named TRUNKSNAPSHOT next time it is moved. >>>> For snapshot build from a certain branch, we can continue as in the >> past - >>>> just announce the revision used for branch snapshot building - or we >> could >>>> introduce a corresponding tag - may be <branch name>SNAPSHOT. >>>> >>> >>> Really, I am mostly asking became of how the buildbots are setup. I think >>> we should standardize on a process and definition of SNAPSHOT. >> >> I agree and I would like to come to the state where we can simply use >> the builds of the build bots and that they are compatible with the >> release builds. I still don't know if that is possible today. At least >> for Mac we don't have a build bot and we need the 64 bit changes. >> >> Linux build bots are to new and are not comparable with the release >> builds Ariel did. > > > Well probably not, and this is unfortunate. Ariel's builds are always right > on for me. Right now none of the builds on buildbot running as SNAPSHOT > work fro any configuration due to the old "tag" problem I think.
you get me wrong, I mean the Linux version of the build bots. Ariel built on CentOS5 systems that have an older baseline. I didn't meant the version of the office sources. > > >> Windows is probably close but I don't know for sure if >> it the same. For example if the 64 bit shell extensions are build >> correct on the Windows bot. >> >> A SNAPSHOT should be a special version where we agree more or less that >> it is worth to take a closer look on it from a QA perspective. Nightly >> builds are for developers mainly. >> > > Well, I'm not sure there's a LOT of difference here. You used the work > snapshot in your previous message, and well, I think that means the same, > whether the QA folks want to get involved at this level or not. > I don't understand Juergen > >> At the moment the SNAPSHOT tag is outdated and we build old version >> which makes of course no sense. >> >> I will move the tag on the branch for the next build ... >> > > thank you! That makes more sense to me. > > >> >> By the way where can I read the information about the setup of the build >> bots and what is build when? >> > > There's not a lot out there for most of us to look at unless we step up to > help more with this.... > > Here is the link to our "build" config page (commiiters only): > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf > > I can't get any specific info on the buildbots themselves -- what specific > OS version, what's installed etc. -- really except what's provided by infra: > > http://ci.apache.org/ > > but some of this site is outdated because our 32-bit linux builds run on: > > http://ci.apache.org/buildslaves/bb-vm2_ubuntu_32bit > > which isn't listed in the ci page, along with tethus-ubuntu which is > running our 64-bit linux nightly build. No Mac buildbot at all. Not sure > what this would take. There is an outstanding issue (old) for it. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4197 > > It would be super if we could get normal and snapshot builds set up on the > buildbot for our various configurations. > > > >> Juergen >> >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, Oliver. >>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org< >> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
