> From: Rob Weir <[email protected]>

> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Hagar Delest 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 12:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Microsoft Censors OpenOffice Download Links
> 
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Hagar Delest <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>>  Objet : Re: Microsoft Censors OpenOffice Download Links
>>>  Not to speak for them, but I suspect they would point out the fact
>>>  that we there are over 100 Apache projects, and they all seem to do
>>>  fine with distribution via the mirrors.
>>> 
>>>  Personally, I'd wonder where this rates with us in terms of 
> priority.
>>>  Compare to, say, forum stability improvements, code signing for our
>>>  installers, and further buildbot coverage, where do torrents rate?
>> 
>>  Of course it's not a priority.
>>  But think about the mechanism of torrent: once it's initiated, it 
> spreads by itself without any input needed. I'm not sure we need powerful 
> resources for the seeds, we can even limit the number of uploads I guess. And 
> then let the torrent spread among users.
>> 
>>  A forum was not in the field of the ASF scope. The AOO forum is still doing 
> and rather well, there is a lot of cooperation and feedback when information 
> is 
> forwarded from on side to the other. So why not make a torrent a first for 
> ASF?
>> 
>>  Please remember that you're handling an office suite, it's not a 
> niche program, it's something that is heavily popular, you tell it yourself 
> when you inform the list about the millions downloads. Ubuntu offers torrents 
> for example.
>> 
> 
> AOO is popular.  Torrents are not.  I bet that <1% of downloads were
> of torrent, when OOo had them.
> 
> Remember, a common question from users is "I just downloaded
> OpenOffice and now I cannot find it".  So skill level of typical user
> is not ideal for explaining how to download via P2P.

I'll add that P2P is not always ideal except for highly popular things.
Once something leaves the popularity (e.g. it's a few months past release, or 
an older version)
than P2P/BitTorrent is very problematic - downloads take a lot longer if 
available at all - as few
users are seeding the P2P networks.

It's certainly been one complaint of mine for various Linux distros that rely 
on P2P networks.

$0.02

Ben

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to