On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 08/06/2013 08:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Kay Schenk<kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rob Weir<robw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Andrea Pescetti<pesce...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 05/08/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you think this needs "trunk"? Nothing under the "branches" has
>>>>>> trunk
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> we have this structure for "updates-site". really I am confused about
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> aspect.
>>>>>> Advice?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This makes sense only if we wish to structure this area with the
>>>>> classic
>>>>> "trunk/branches/tags" schema. Since I don't expect we will store code
>>>>> or
>>>>> test versions under "branding/", I think we can start with no
>>>>> structure.
>>>>>
>>>> If
>>>>
>>>>> really needed (but I don't see any possible reasons now, since that
>>>>> area
>>>>>
>>>> is
>>>>
>>>>> meant to be used to archive approved materials) we can add the
>>>>> trunk/branches/tags structure later.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> +1. I don't think we'll be doing branching and tagging in this area.
>>>>
>>>> -Rob
>>>>
>>>>
>>> OK, I did not supply "trunk". The newest image files are now moved to the
>>> new branding area. More to come, and cleanup in web site area, etc.
>>>
>>>
>> It might be worth having some sub-directories there, with no files in the
>> root.
>>
>
Well we can adjust as we go along. RIght now, I am still trying to hunt
down actual old "svgs" that may rightfully belong in the new area. So far,
I am only finding saved resized svgs but not the originals for most
items. So, these are cases when sub-dividing into old vs new would be a
good idea.
> I would leave the warning file in the root dir.
>
>
> For example:
>>
>> /branding/logo/contest --- have the final submission from ChrisR
>> there, including supporting files
>>
>> /branding/logo/master -- have the final version of the logo here,
>> with a name like master-logo.svg. But no unnecessary other files.
>>
>> /branding/logo/special -- this is where we can store the source
>> versions of special logos we do, like for International Mother
>> Language Day or Christmas
>>
>> Are there other aspects of the brand that have artifacts that we need
>> to store? Maybe not now, but I could imagine having short video
>> titles that could indicate an official video on our official YouTube
>> channel, if we had one. Or an ODT document with our official letter
>> head. Things like this could fit into this directory structure as
>> well.
>>
>> A chart showing the RGB values for the logo colors would be good to
>> have, as well as instructions for how to use/not use the logo. But
>> maybe that belongs on the wiki?
>>
>> Finally, since this is a murky side of OpenOffice.org that has caused
>> confusion before, I wonder if we should have a /branding/records
>> directory where keep a simple text log of entities that have been
>> given permission to use the logo or related trademarks? Or is that
>> redundant with something Shane already does?
>>
>
> Good idea but IMHO this is better located in the pmc/private part of SVN.
>
A toss-up for me on this...and do we know what records Shane keeps?
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
-- Jon Bon Jovi
