On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Guenter Marxen <guenter.mar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Am 08.06.2013 00:39, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Guenter Marxen >> <guenter.mar...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> you invited all to vote (although only pmc member votes are binding). >>> >>> You did not report the non-pmc-votes. Are they not worth to be reported >>> or >>> was there a complete other (perhaps unwanted) result? >>> >> >> I did not tally those votes since they were non-binding. However, > > > But they couldt have given good hints for an further improvement of the > logo. (That could be achieved in very short time (72 hours).) >
The ballots contained very, very few comments. And remember we already had a survey of 5000 users where we received many hundreds of comments. I'm not saying that there is nothing new to be learned, but that it is unlikely to have occurred in 5 or 6 non-binding ballots as compared to, say, recent discussions on the mailing list regarding these logos. > >> all votes were echoed to the mailing list and are available in the >> archives, if anyone wants to analyze them further. > > > So to say, we (as users, normal or power users) can spare every effort > (votes, BZ reports etc.) because they are not (you say) "binding", but > definetely it means not "worth to consider". > "Not worth to consider" are your words, not mine. If analysis of the non-binding votes is interesting to you personally, then please do so, and post whatever you find. Nothing is stopping you. But arguing about my priorities is certainly a pointless activity for you to engage in. > It's the same as in case with the votes in BZ. In your mail of 2013-03-20 > (ID <cap-ksogy5rzvwe8owct_w_ovupmg7wsr8uow2s8xvujauu-...@mail.gmail.com>) > you wrote > > "... So my approach will be to not use Bugzilla issues at all." > > Why shoudt we, users (and supporters) of AOO, do any tests and BZ reports if > they are not used "at all"? > > Perhaps a not so "efficient" technocratic view like yours would be better > for the product in such cases, although in many (or most) other aspects it's > adequate. > IMHO you are merely being argumentative. I'm not inclined to discuss this topic further with you. Enjoy your weekend. -Rob > > Günter Marxen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
