Am 08.06.2013 00:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Guenter Marxen
<guenter.mar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi Rob,
you invited all to vote (although only pmc member votes are binding).
You did not report the non-pmc-votes. Are they not worth to be reported or
was there a complete other (perhaps unwanted) result?
I did not tally those votes since they were non-binding. However,
But they couldt have given good hints for an further improvement of the
logo. (That could be achieved in very short time (72 hours).)
all votes were echoed to the mailing list and are available in the
archives, if anyone wants to analyze them further.
So to say, we (as users, normal or power users) can spare every effort
(votes, BZ reports etc.) because they are not (you say) "binding", but
definetely it means not "worth to consider".
It's the same as in case with the votes in BZ. In your mail of
2013-03-20 (ID
<cap-ksogy5rzvwe8owct_w_ovupmg7wsr8uow2s8xvujauu-...@mail.gmail.com>)
you wrote
"... So my approach will be to not use Bugzilla issues at all."
Why shoudt we, users (and supporters) of AOO, do any tests and BZ
reports if they are not used "at all"?
Perhaps a not so "efficient" technocratic view like yours would be
better for the product in such cases, although in many (or most) other
aspects it's adequate.
Günter Marxen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
