Hi Rob, Hi all of us, I took time to think about your a), b), c), d) e) solution concerning the feedback of survey, and your additional e) solution (to be defined, if relevant)
May I suggest this e) to-be-defined solution as following as a mix of a) and d) : e) *Publicly post all, the good the bad and the ugly* - all comments and data of the survey are published on a document available across the tools used for the project, maybe on the confluence engine pages - AND *Publicly post the feedback only for the top 5 logos* as a sort of synthesis page where a link for the entire feeback is also given. I would say, in one hand, it would be honnest to publish publicly the entire results of the survey - for transparency, and even the ugly comments could give information both concerning the art design perception and profil attempts of the venerable public who participated - and in the second hand, it would be usefull to get only the top 5 logos comments which allow some of us to do not waste time to read the entire comments of all logos - and to focus energy and emotions on 5 elected logo candidates. Note it is only a point of view, and not a stupid temptative to impose a soit-disant universal thruth. Freely, Antoine 2013/4/25 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> > A quick update. We've been running for 18 hours, enough time to get > around the globe. > > So far we have 1712 responses. > > It is probably worth thinking about what we want to do with all the > data. I did an analysis of the results so far, and some quick > thoughts: > > 1) The question asking for person's age appears to be useless. Unless > we have an unusual number of users in their 70's , 80's and 90's, a > large number of users are entering their birth year rather than their > age. So I'm planning on just ignoring that field. (This is probably > why you often see this done as a drop down list of years in other > surveys, less error prone). > > 2) I will be able to produce a list of logos, sorted by average score > and given the % breakdown of 1's, 2's, 3's, etc. Maybe even a > histogram chart for each. > > 3) We're receiving a lot of comments on the individual logos, many > more than I expected. So we can expect that for each logo there will > be 200 or more text comments. I'm not sure what we want to do with > these. Since this is an anonymous survey the users are quite blunt > with their comments on the logos they did not prefer, using coarse > language, etc., stuff that would be inappropriate if a list subscriber > posted. It is not all constructive criticism. Some of it is quite > harsh. On the other hand, there is a tremendous amount of valuable > feedback as well, that we and the designers specifically might find > useful. So what to do? > > a) Post it all, the good the bad and the ugly? > > b) Remove or censor only profanity and post the rest? > > c) Make feedback available only to the individual designers via email > > d) Publicly post the feedback only for the top 5 logos, share the rest > privately with the individual designers. > > e) Something else? > > > -Rob > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
