On 25 April 2013 14:53, Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:18:29 -0400 > Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > A quick update. We've been running for 18 hours, enough time to get > > around the globe. > > > > So far we have 1712 responses. > > > > It is probably worth thinking about what we want to do with all the > > data. I did an analysis of the results so far, and some quick > > thoughts: > > > > 1) The question asking for person's age appears to be useless. Unless > > we have an unusual number of users in their 70's , 80's and 90's, a > > large number of users are entering their birth year rather than their > > age. So I'm planning on just ignoring that field. (This is probably > > why you often see this done as a drop down list of years in other > > surveys, less error prone). > > > > 2) I will be able to produce a list of logos, sorted by average score > > and given the % breakdown of 1's, 2's, 3's, etc. Maybe even a > > histogram chart for each. > > > > 3) We're receiving a lot of comments on the individual logos, many > > more than I expected. So we can expect that for each logo there will > > be 200 or more text comments. I'm not sure what we want to do with > > these. Since this is an anonymous survey the users are quite blunt > > with their comments on the logos they did not prefer, using coarse > > language, etc., stuff that would be inappropriate if a list subscriber > > posted. It is not all constructive criticism. Some of it is quite > > harsh. On the other hand, there is a tremendous amount of valuable > > feedback as well, that we and the designers specifically might find > > useful. So what to do? > > > > a) Post it all, the good the bad and the ugly? > > > > b) Remove or censor only profanity and post the rest? > > > > c) Make feedback available only to the individual designers via email > > > > d) Publicly post the feedback only for the top 5 logos, share the rest > > privately with the individual designers. > > > > e) Something else? > > > > > > -Rob > > > > d is best option > > We are only interested in the 5 best (although if there are close ties for > places this ought be extended); we don't care about the comments for the > "also rans" (to use a horse-racing term. If there were a preponderance of > comments for any of the top five suggesting a particular modification, the > designer might wish to revise his design for the run-off (even to the > extent, I suggest, of allowing him have the original and the revision in > the run-off). > +1, with a slight exception, I have no idea if it 3-5-7, I suggest Rob makes an analysis and take the top (how ever many that is).
I think all the designers should have access to all the comments (not the general public), and we should only make the choosen ones public (please exclude obvious malious ones). For the next round, I would like the designers to present as described earlier. @rob could you mail when the respond rate drops dramatically, that might be a good time to close the survey. rgds Jan I. > > > -- > Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
