On 3/27/13 3:23 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Different opinions came up and we had some discussion and you >> pointed out that you can live with feedback. Where is exactly >> your problem now? > > I don't have any problem at all. > >> I don't think that it will help us if we react this way. > > I am not reacting. Please don't turn this into a circus like the > one with the 0^0. > >> Really nobody wanted that you revert anything here. > > I am no native English speaker, but for the content, and the tone, > of Andre mails, I understood he wanted his extension back: > >> I don't see why this change should be a good thing. > >> I was hoping that I would find the time in the future to fix >> this > >> Including the pre-bundled extensions into the core is a >> workaround not a fix. > >> We are still able (well until your changes) to release the >> presenter console under Apache license > >> I still don' t see the benefit of the change. > >> [...] This is something that I have used several times in the >> past and always was very glad that I had it. > > And he got it back (together with the Presentation Minimizer, as > it makes no sense to have one pre-registered extension and the > other integrated). > > Again, I don't have any problem at all, nor then, nor now :)
Just a short question before I lose it out of focus, do you plan to revert your revert? Or can/should we revert it? I really think it was a misunderstanding and nothing else. Juergen > > > Regards > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
