On 3/27/13 3:23 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Different opinions came up and we had some discussion and you >> pointed out that you can live with feedback. Where is exactly >> your problem now? > > I don't have any problem at all.
I glad to hear that, anything would have surprised me a little bit ;-9 > >> I don't think that it will help us if we react this way. > > I am not reacting. Please don't turn this into a circus like the > one with the 0^0. sorry if I used the wrong words, I simply didn't understand why you reverted it. And please no 0^0 circus ;-) > >> Really nobody wanted that you revert anything here. > > I am no native English speaker, but for the content, and the tone, > of Andre mails, I understood he wanted his extension back: I think it is simply a misunderstanding. Let me try to explain it. 1. you workaround an issue with pre-registered extensions by converting and integrating the extension into the normal code. The integration of these extensions in the normal code is a good thing from my point of view because I see it as well as a very useful core feature. Another option would have been to fix the pre-registered extension issue. You decided to solve the problem by working on the integration. Good so far. 2. Andre tried to explain that the design of for example the presenter screen is focused of being an extension. Otherwise the design would have been completely different and he would have used core feature directly and different. And he saw no real benefit for the user and I believe he wasn't aware of the linux issue with pre-registered extensions, at least not in detail. Maybe he used the wrong words (we are all no native speakers) but I believe he didn't wanted to revert it at any point. I am sure Andre will comment it as well. > >> I don't see why this change should be a good thing. > >> I was hoping that I would find the time in the future to fix >> this > >> Including the pre-bundled extensions into the core is a >> workaround not a fix. > >> We are still able (well until your changes) to release the >> presenter console under Apache license > >> I still don' t see the benefit of the change. > >> [...] This is something that I have used several times in the >> past and always was very glad that I had it. > > And he got it back (together with the Presentation Minimizer, as > it makes no sense to have one pre-registered extension and the > other integrated). +1 > > Again, I don't have any problem at all, nor then, nor now :) ok good, can we revert it then because I don't see that anybody has the time to dive deeper in the extension manager. At least when Andre confirmed that he didn't wanted revert anything. Juergen > > > Regards > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
