Am 08.02.2013 10:57, schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > Hello, > >>> It's not only Fedora, but also other GNU/Linux >> distributions using such >>> transitional packages. It's a common way supporting users to update >>> their system. >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative_use > > Mmh ... > > I read that, but what is your opinion? Did you mean that the current > situation is OK or this needs to be improved? > > I think Rob's statement was correct, or in other words: > > Maybe Pepsi is good, Maybe Coke is good, Maybe both are good > > but: > > Pepsi in a Coke bottle is not good and Coke in a Pepsi bottle is also not > good. > > > note: > I'm _not_ talking about the _technical part_, because of it I do not know > enough. But I'm talking about the public impact of terms. > IMO it's not the best way trying to make Apache OpenOffice part of GNU/Linuy distributions again to blame them.
Yes, I'm also talking about the public impact. So let's concentrate to the thinks, which are now important, as Andrea has proposed. Regards Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
