> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> It comes down to user confusion. We've already seen users confused by > this, where they think they are installing OpenOffice and instead get > something else. This is classic trademark infringement. You can't > offer bottles of Coca-Cola for to consumers and then fill the bottles > with Pepsi. +1 Yes, this is a true statement. In my opinion the problem is not only the problem with the trade mark (or the simple program-name) but also a public relations problem. I do not know the team of Feodora, but I know many people of LO / TDF and, let me be clear, _some_ (_not_ all) consider it well to cultivate a public representation that users subliminally says that LO's successor OOo is . (not as an official statement, but subliminally) I think these things are a real problem for AOO (In the public perception) and we must endeavor that something is changing. Do not get me miss, it's not a matter of dispute, but a question of correct handling each other. Greetings Jörg
