On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> -1 >>>> >>> >>> I've reverted that commit. Getting this wrong could have serious >>> repercussions, so let's make sure we get it right. >> >> Not exactly. You left the link which was the main thing I wanted to add! A >> full revert would have been anti-social. The sociable thing is to ask the >> committer to do it. It's their commit and we are all in this together. OK. >> > > IMHO, the sociable thing is not to feel such exclusive ownership over > one's commit that one would be offended if someone else reverted it > because they thought it was harmful. We are all in this together, > right?
Nope. It's universally uncool to revert someone else's commit. You raised the -1, let *them* do the revert, after you've provided convincing rationale to the community... --tim