-1 Could we please take this to legal-discuss, or to Trademarks@? I know you think you are protecting the OpenOffice.org trademark. So your intentions are good. But I'm pretty sure that you are actually risking the trademark by applying it to the website when the trademark registration is explicitly for software, not for a website.
So let's revert that until we get further clarification. You don't want to mess around with trademark fraud. Thanks. -Rob On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > The next shed to bike ;-) > > On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:21 PM, w...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: wave >> Date: Fri Feb 1 23:21:23 2013 >> New Revision: 1441659 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441659&view=rev >> Log: >> No clear link back to www.openoffice.org >> >> Modified: >> openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext >> >> Modified: openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext?rev=1441659&r1=1441658&r2=1441659&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext (original) >> +++ openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext Fri Feb 1 23:21:23 2013 >> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ >> - [License](/license.html) >> - [Trademarks](/trademarks.html) >> - [Press](/press.html) >> + - [OpenOffice.org®](http://www.openoffice.org/) >> + >> # Community >> >> - [Get Involved](/get-involved.html) >> >> >
