Hi, Lucas Yes, you can mark it as failed, and attach the defect number to the test case.
Thanks. Regards, Shan Zhu On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Lucas Burson <[email protected]> wrote: > Submitted as enhancement to BZ ([1]). I'll ignore the test case on > TestLink. > > Lucas > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121459 > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Lucas Burson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Can we remove the test from TestLink or should I just mark it as failed? > > Since it isn't implemented it doesn't make much sense to have it as a > > regression test. > > On Dec 9, 2012 11:50 PM, "Zhang Lu" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Zhu shen, > >> Sure, it can be implemented as a feature due to workload, thanks! > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Shan Zhu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, Lu > >> > It's okay. IMHO, it can be implemented as a feature enhancement. Then > >> > prepare a formal testing to verify this implementation. It will be > >> better > >> > than checking it as defect verification. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Shan Zhu > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Zhang Lu <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi, Lucas and Shan > >> > > > >> > > There is no code for checking the validation of input value as > Zhu > >> > Shan > >> > > said, I have got through this part code, not only whole numbers, but > >> also > >> > > all other categories existed this issue. So I think it can be > handled > >> as > >> > a > >> > > defect. If user input an illegal value, there is meaningless for > data > >> > > validation. > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Lu Zhang > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
