Can we remove the test from TestLink or should I just mark it as failed? Since it isn't implemented it doesn't make much sense to have it as a regression test. On Dec 9, 2012 11:50 PM, "Zhang Lu" <zhanglu....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Zhu shen, > Sure, it can be implemented as a feature due to workload, thanks! > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Shan Zhu <shanzh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, Lu > > It's okay. IMHO, it can be implemented as a feature enhancement. Then > > prepare a formal testing to verify this implementation. It will be better > > than checking it as defect verification. > > > > Regards, > > Shan Zhu > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Zhang Lu <zhanglu....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, Lucas and Shan > > > > > > There is no code for checking the validation of input value as Zhu > > Shan > > > said, I have got through this part code, not only whole numbers, but > also > > > all other categories existed this issue. So I think it can be handled > as > > a > > > defect. If user input an illegal value, there is meaningless for data > > > validation. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Lu Zhang > > > > > >
