On 2026-10-02 19:00:11, Gregory Nutt wrote: > If the vendor does grant the HAL to the ASF, then I see no benefit of a > separate nuttx-hal-espressif Repository. Why not just a directory under > nuttx that provides existing CI benefits and keeps the build simple? > > If they do not grant the software to the ASF, then it cannot reside in a > separate Apache repository, so the only alternatives are: (1) something > outside of the ASF repository, like https://github.com/nuttx, or (2) we > could simply manage the code as 3rd party code embedded within nuttx (as a > lot of other code is).
Ok, I probably have no idea what I'm talking here about, but here it goes. Why don't you create new github user called "nuttx-3rd-party-code", create esp32 repo there, and just clone repo from oem? Sure, having repo in hands of single person or sharing password to single account is not an ideal solution. But many people can mirror it as well so in case someone goes rogue it's easy to recreate and just change single variable in nuttx source to get code from different repo. Just an idea.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
