+1 Em seg., 7 de abr. de 2025 às 21:16, Yanfeng Liu <yfliu2...@qq.com.invalid> escreveu:
> +1 > On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 17:13 +0800, chao an wrote: > > Hi community, > > > > Some green hand and individual developer who are not familiar with nuttx > > may be confused by the naming of modlib, in currect implement, modlib as > an > > elf loader and parser, does not provide any features other than elf. > > > > In this pull request, I plan to rename modlib to elf, and adjust it from > > the architecture level as follows: > > > > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15765 > > > > > > [image: image.png] > > > > In addition from other popular operating systems, different loadable > types > > are all implemented in binfmt. Therefore, it is also impossible for > modlib > > to support formats other than ELF in the future: > > > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_elf.c > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_elf_fdpic.c > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_flat.c > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_misc.c > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_script.c > > > https://github.com/alexbousso/kernel_2.4.18-14/blob/master/fs/binfmt_coff.c > > > > This is where they belong: > > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/tree/master/binfmt > > > > > > So I need your vote here: > > If you prefer modlib, please reply with -1. > > If you recommend libelf, please reply with +1. > > > > BRs, > >
